Given the extreme market volatility since the 2008 crisis, and the huge impact it can have on a multinational company's balance sheet and bottom line when it comes to foreign exchange exposures, what are the best options (pun, intended) for hedging volatility these days? From average rate options and baskets to partial barriers, compounds, and gated knock outs―what works, what doesn’t and why?
As we continue our Numerix webinar series on the best ways to manage your FX exposures, Udi Sela, Vice President of Client Solutions at Numerix, examines a renowned multinational US company with receivables in multiple currencies and an US Dollar-denominated cost base.
After listening to Mr. Sela’s comparative analysis examining the possible option strategies Google could have used—and exploring the initial cost, potential upside and worse case scenarios for these strategies—we come to see that it would make the most sense for a multi-national company like Google, with its ongoing receivables, to have used a combination of average rate, partial barrier forward and basket options to most effectively hedge its foreign exchange exposures.
We also observe that the Target Redemption Forward strategy could not be viewed as an effective hedge, since it would be way too risky. Mr. Sela wisely points out that this strategy is typically used by treasurers that ‘missed’ the company’s budgeted hedge rate.
View the webinar replay to learn more about the following FX hedging strategies:
• Average Rate Option
• Partial Barrier Forward
• Compound Option
• Gated Knock Out
• Cross Asset Knock Out
• Basket Option
• Target Redemption Forward
For a look at other hedging strategies involving a large Swiss multinational company, read “In Search of the Winning Hedging Strategy: A Look at Different FX Hedging Options.”
You can also download Mr. Sela's article, published in gtnews, “Heading FX Exposures: Which Strategy is Right for Your Business?”
Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for more information.